BREXIT - TIME TO END 50 YEARS OF LIES.

BREXIT –   TIME TO END  50  YEARS OF  LIES.                              

 

Since we started the last 50 years of closer association with our European neighbours across the channel we have been involved in one continuous flow of lies. The only truth is that we should never have joined the Common Market, which turned into the European Union, in the first place.

 

It all started in the early nineteen seventies when Ted Heath, the then Prime Minister, lied to Parliament to get them to agree to the UK joining the Common Market, which it did on 1^st. January 1973.

There was a certain amount of unrest in the country over the way that the UK had been taken into the Common Market and in 1975, Harold Wilson, the then Prime Minister, agreed to hold a Referendum on 5^th. June with the simple question to REMAIN or to LEAVE. The result was 67 per cent in favour of REMAIN. Note that there were no protest about the result as the REMAIN campaigners, the then

Pro-European Activists, had got the result that they wanted.

Unfortunately at the time the electorate were not made aware of what had happened and that by voting REMAIN they were agreeing to the UK participating in a process that would change from a Trading Agreement into a Political involvement in a Federal States of Europe with Germany at its head. If they had been made aware of this intention there is a good chance that virtually nobody would have voted to REMAIN. There were a few people who tried to question where this might end up but they were shut down by claims that it was “Purely a Trading Agreement”.

The lies continued as political change moved on and we were told that the UK would remain a Sovereign Nation and benefit from being part of a large, stable and successful International association. There was never any mention of the fact that the UK being involved gave the EU a certain amount of credibility around the world. John Major, the then Prime Minister, actually lied to us when he signed the Maastrict Treaty, which he told us was a “tidying up exercise”, but actually transferred OUR SOVERERGNTY from London to Brussels.

Despite the commitment made to the electorate by David Cameron, the then Prime Minister, after having announced the Referendum that “ This is your decision. The Government will implement what you decide “, it is rumoured that he also made a promise to certain politicians and the EU that there was nothing to fear from giving the Ordinary People this vote. There were many lies told in the run up to the referendum in a campaign of Project Fear and Scaremongering which all ended up being unfounded.

 

On the 23^rd. June 2016 the people of the UK voted in a Referendum, a “Peoples Vote”, with a simple choice to REMAIN or to LEAVE, and they voted by a reasonable majority to LEAVE the EU in a clean break with NO ties, a “NO DEAL BREXIT”, to take back OUR Sovereignty, our national INDEPENDENCE and become an Global trading nation once again.

 

Following  a vote by 498 politicians Article 50 was triggered. It gives notice of a countries intention to leave and gives 2 years to negotiate an exit deal. When the UK triggered Article 50 it was thought that once in motion it could not be stopped or extended except by unanimous agreement. While it is expected that the period would be used to make agreements, there is no legal requirement to do so, and at the end of the period the country will leave with or without a deal. It would appear that we were lied to about that and the Fanatical Remainer Rebels are using political procedures to frustrate and alter that.

While over 400 parliamentarians voted to allow the Referendum to go ahead, they totally miscalculated the mood in the country towards the EU, and there is no way that they expected the result that they got. There is no way that certain members of the political elite, Pro-EU Activists, with personal interests in the EU, and career politicians with promises of lucrative career prospects, were going to accept anything other than a REMAIN vote.

There is no way that the British People want to be part of a European Union Superstate. They owe it to the people who made the ultimate sacrifice to secure and maintain our freedom, to break away from what successive Governments have got us into. We joined a trading agreement in good faith, perhaps in retrospect we were a bit naïve to expect something that sounded good to actually be so, but things were very different then, and we are still keen to involved in a Trading Agreement. We are not leaving Europe, we consider ourselves to be an integral part having fought for its freedom as well as our own, we are leaving the EU, and especially the direct control fro Brusells, so that we do not become a Province in a German lead Superstate, the United States of Europe. The EU already has its own flag, anthem, parliament, currency, embassies, executive laws and civil service, and now it is planning, following the signing of an agreement between Germany and France,, to create its own army. History would never forgive us if we voluntarily allowed the British Armed Forces to be controlled by Germany. There was life before the EU and Britain managed to enter unchartered areas and in most cases profit from the experience.

The Ordinary People have been heard but there is no way that they are being listened to, and yet again they are being lied to. The British people do not like being lied to but this time they are annoyed and frustrated because they are facing a revolt by the political elite, against their wishes, and they appear, despite having won the vote, to have NO CONTROL over how it is being handled.

 

MPs are meant to be the servants of the people, not the masters.

 

“When ordinary people do nothing the fanatics take over”. Edmund Burke

 

James Hancock. A Common Man.

 

Ormskirk.                                                                                                     Ref: B90514

(e) jh.acm@btinternet.com              

HEATHROW 13 - DISTRICT JUDGE DEBORAH WRIGHT "PLEASE LET THESE ORDINARY PEOPLE GO FREE"

HEATHROW 13- DISTRICT JUDGE DEBORAH WRIGHT

“PLEASE LET THESE ORDINARY PEOPLE GO FREE!”

 

 

On Wednesday 24th. February 2016, 13 ordinary people known as th Heathrow 13, will turn up at Willesden Magistrates’ Court, to hear what their sentences are going to be after having been found guilty, on 25^th. January 2016, following a 2 week trial, of aggravated trespass which caused disruptions and delays at Heathrow Airport on 13^th. July 2015. District Judge Deborah Wright told them that they should be prepared for “jail time” because of the “astronomical cost” that the disruption caused. As it has now been pointed out that these 13 ordinary people were NOT directly responsible for the “astronomical cost” I hope that she sees fit to withdraw her threat of jail from her sentencing and “let these ordinary people go free” to return to their families.

 

It is time for Heathrow Airport to stand up and admit that “they were at fault”, and “responsible”, for allowing this group of ordinary people, who were peaceful protesters, to get past their security systems with all of their equipment and gain access to a restricted area, set up a sophisticated fortress with a polar bear on top of an iceberg and other members chained to it and cause disruption, delays and astronomical cost. They should be particularly grateful that this failing wasn’t discovered by a terrorist group who could have run amuck and caused untold mayhem.  It is my understanding that in EU Law the airport owners and operators are “solely responsible” to make sure that nothing under their control, from a mechanical fault, a pilot not turning up, protesters blocking the entrance down to a simple fuse having blown, is allowed to cause any disruption and delays what so ever, and they should take “all steps to make sure that they can not happen” and that backup systems are in place to cover unforeseen happenings.

 

James Hancock.

 

A Good Common Man.

( Because of what happens when “good men do nothing” Edmund Burke)

HEATHROW 13 - MAY HAVE UNKNOWINGLY PREVENTED A POSSIBLE TERRORIST ATTACK !

HEATHROW 13 – MAY HAVE UNKNOWINGLY

PREVENTED A POSSIBLE TERRORIST ATTACK !

 

While they may not have appreciated it at the time, the Heathrow 13 were doing the airport a very great favour by highlighting a breach in the security system which if it had been discovered by a heavily armed and murderous group of terrorists carrying machine guns, wearing suicide vests and carrying grenades the catastrophic outcome doesn’t even bear thinking about. Then who would the owners and operators of the mighty Heathrow Airport have blamed for the “disruption and delays”.

 

In an article, “Airport welcomes guilty verdict”, some six months after the happening, the owners and operators of the airport should be hanging their heads in shame that they have allowed things to get to this stage to cover up a major and serious breach in their security and that they are prepared to gloat at the way that these ordinary people are being treated and the stress that they and their families are being put through. The fact that they are prepared to sacrifice the possible futures of these thirteen ordinary people and their families in order to cover up their own failings is reprehendable. Instead of demands for expansion of the airport their should be demands for it to be closed down until the operators can prove that the safety of their employees, passengers, flight operators, local residents and the general public along with security matters are their very top priority.

It is time for Heathrow Airport to stand up and admit that they were at fault for allowing this group of ordinary people, who were peaceful protesters, to get past their security systems and gain access to a restricted area and cause disruption and delays. It is my understanding that in EU Law the airport owners and operators are responsible for any disruption and delays, what ever the reason, and they should take all steps to make sure that they do not happen.

 

James Hancock.

A Good Common Man.

( Because of what happens when “good men do nothing” Edmund Burke)